Two Trees
Copyright ©2014, Ken Thomas
Viewed times
Photographer: |
Ken Thomas
|
Folder: |
Ken's Images |
Uploaded: |
11-Aug-2014 11:05 CEST |
Current Rating: |
8.00/1
View all ratings
Delete my rating
|
Model release available: |
|
Camera: |
Olympus E-500 |
Exposure time: |
1/125 s |
Aperture: |
F8 |
Focal length: |
14 mm |
Lens: |
Digital Zuiko 7-14mm f/4.0 |
Focusing method: |
|
ISO: |
100 |
White balance: |
|
Flash: |
no |
Image format: |
|
Processing applied: |
|
Various: |
|
Image resized to: |
900x401 |
Comment/Rate
Share this Image
|
NO SUBJECT
a beautiful composition and I love the b/w-choice.
I would probably have cropped the beneath part where the texture ( aprox 4 centimeter) is distracting me from the beauty of the scape
juliette gribnau at 18:13 CEST on 11-Aug-2014 [Reply]
Juliette
juliette gribnau wrote:
> a beautiful composition and I love the b/w-choice.
> I would probably have cropped the beneath part where the texture ( aprox 4 centimeter) is
> distracting me from the beauty of the scape
>
Thanks Juliette. I take your point, I had reservations myself. However, cropping would have upset the balance of the composition. As you know, I often crop to very much non-standard formats to get the composition I like. Not always the composition that others would prefer, but the composition I like. You have done me the honour of praising the composition in some of these images; so I must get it right some of the time.
Ken Thomas at 19:20 CEST on 11-Aug-2014 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Ken Thomas wrote:
> juliette gribnau wrote:
> > a beautiful composition and I love the b/w-choice.
> > I would probably have cropped the beneath part where the texture ( aprox 4 centimeter) is
> > distracting me from the beauty of the scape
> >
> Thanks Juliette. I take your point, I had reservations myself. However, cropping would have
> upset the balance of the composition. As you know, I often crop to very much non-standard
> formats to get the composition I like. Not always the composition that others would prefer,
> but the composition I like. You have done me the honour of praising the composition in some
> of these images; so I must get it right some of the time.
>
yes; I often admire your compositions.... I don't know if some cropping on this one would ruin the balance.. I think it is worth a try
juliette gribnau at 19:30 CEST on 11-Aug-2014 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
If you take equal bits off of the top and bottom, you'll still have the same composition, just not as tall.
Katrina Adams at 22:24 CEST on 11-Aug-2014 [Reply]
Katrina
Katrina Adams wrote:
> If you take equal bits off of the top and bottom, you'll still have the same composition,
> just not as tall.
>
Yes, sort of, but not really the same. I'll play with it tomorrow and see what I think. Your comments are valued ladies, thank you. If I did post-processing I'd use some blurring tool on the grass to minimise the texture, but I don't play such games as you know.
Ken Thomas at 23:02 CEST on 11-Aug-2014 [Reply]
Katrina & Juliette
Ken Thomas wrote:
> Katrina Adams wrote:
> > If you take equal bits off of the top and bottom, you'll still have the same composition,
> > just not as tall.
> >
> Yes, sort of, but not really the same. I'll play with it tomorrow and see what I think.
> Your comments are valued ladies, thank you. If I did post-processing I'd use some blurring
> tool on the grass to minimise the texture, but I don't play such games as you know.
>
I'm quite happy that I've managed to get three very different and quite well received photographs out of the same two trees. As Juliette has said before, there is something special about a simple image that works well.
Ken Thomas at 23:04 CEST on 11-Aug-2014 [Reply]