![]() The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus and OM system micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Register Search Forum Actions New Document New Folder List Folders List Documents List Groups List Users Camera resources Olympus 4000 Olympus 4040 Olympus 5050 Olympus 5060 Olympus 7070 Olympus 8080 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus E-M5 Olympus E-P1 Olympus E-P2 Olympus E-PL1 Olympus E-PL3 Olympus E1 Olympus E3 Olympus E30 Olympus E300 Olympus E330 Olympus E400 Olympus E410 Olympus E420 Olympus E500 Olympus E510 Olympus E520 Olympus E620 m4/3 lenses Camera FAQs Terms of Service Photo contest Submissions page Hall of fame Folders About this site Documents Polls Private folders Public folders Categories Abstract Action/Motion Animal Architecture Candid/Snapshot Cities/Urban Documentation Fashion/Glamour Historical Landscape Macro Miscellaneous Nature Night/Low light People Polls Sand and Sea Sky Tourist/Travel Contact Us |
Regional Airport - 3
This McDonald Douglas (MD600N) 8-place helicopter is such a rich blue that the sky paled by comparison - even with the polarizer filter. Both the MD-600N and its smaller cousin (the MD-520N) sport the new NOTAR technology; neither helicopter has the traditional tail rotor, ergo the name: NOTAR (NO-TAil-Rotor).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright ©2004, MyOlympus.org. All Rights Reserved. |
NO SUBJECT
Like your pictures Leon but just a question
Why don't you take the whole airplane / helicopter in the shot...?
I think for a plain spotter it would be nice to see the total machine , of course shots from details can be also interesting but now looking at these three images I miss something in each of them...
Best regards,
Fonzy - at 15:16 CET on 19-Mar-2007 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
G?Day Fons:
Thanks for taking the time to view the images I posted from the airport and for your comments. I truly appreciate someone with ?your eye? taking time to provide feedback.
As to how come just a partial shot rather than a full view of the aircraft is concerned, as you know this website has a limit as to the size of what can be downloaded; consequently, if you post an item that shows the entire object then downsize it (to 800 x 600) there is a good chance that in doing so the image loses its impact ? in a visual sense, that is.
I took a total of 16 shots of the MD-600. Some were of the entire helicopter, the rest were close-ups. As you correctly note ? ? details can be also interesting ? ? Clearly, the close-ups have more detail and more effect, at least to my way of thinking.
I?ll post two more images of the helicopter; one shows the entire airframe, including the rotor blades; the second is closer than the original photo-file I posted. Let me know what you think.
Ciao!
Leon Plympton at 22:21 CET on 19-Mar-2007 [Reply]